People With Significant Control (PSCs) and the Transparency in Corporate Ownership
UK's PSC system enhances transparency in corporate ownership by requiring companies to disclose individuals or entities with significant control over their operations. This move aims to prevent financial crimes, ensuring a fair and transparent business environment, integral to economic stability.

In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on transparency in company incorporation. The United Kingdom has taken significant strides in this area by introducing a system that requires companies to identify and disclose individuals or entities who have significant control over their operations. These individuals or entities are known as People with Significant Control, or PSCs, and they play a crucial role in maintaining transparency and preventing the misuse of corporate structures for illicit activities. Let's delve deeper into this topic and understand the ins and outs of PSCs and their role in UK corporate ownership.
Who Are People With Significant Control?
People with Significant Control, or PSCs, are individuals or entities that meet certain criteria set by the UK government. These criteria determine whether someone has a substantial influence or control over a company's management or its policies. This can include having ownership of more than 25% of the company's share capital or voting rights, having the ability to appoint or remove the majority of the company's directors, or exercising significant influence or control over the company's activities.
In the United Kingdom, the concept of People with Significant Control was introduced as part of the Companies Act 2006. The aim of this legislation was to increase transparency and accountability in corporate governance. By identifying and disclosing the individuals or entities that have significant control over a company, the UK government seeks to prevent illicit activities such as money laundering, tax evasion, and fraud.
Identifying People with Significant Control is crucial for maintaining a fair and open business environment. It allows stakeholders, including investors, employees, and the general public, to have a clearer understanding of who holds the reins and makes important decisions within a company. This transparency promotes trust and confidence in the corporate sector, which is essential for economic growth and stability.
It is worth noting that the criteria for determining People with Significant Control may vary depending on the legal structure of the company. For example, if the company is a limited liability partnership (LLP), the criteria may differ from those applicable to a private limited company or a public company. The UK government provides detailed guidance on how to determine People with Significant Control based on the specific legal structure of the company.
Once identified, People with Significant Control must be registered with Companies House, the UK government's official register of companies. This registration ensures that the information is publicly available and easily accessible to anyone who wishes to investigate the ownership and control of a company. Failure to comply with the requirement to register People with Significant Control can result in penalties and legal consequences.
In addition to registering with Companies House, companies are also required to keep an up-to-date register of their People with Significant Control. This internal register must be maintained and made available for inspection upon request. By keeping an accurate record of People with Significant Control, companies can demonstrate their commitment to transparency and comply with their legal obligations.
It is important to note that the concept of People with Significant Control is not limited to individuals. Entities such as trusts, partnerships, and other legal structures can also be considered People with Significant Control if they meet the criteria set by the UK government. This recognises that control and influence can be exerted through various means and legal arrangements.
What Are the Criteria for Determining PSC Status?
Determining PSC status involves analysing various factors to assess the level of influence or control an individual or entity has over a company. These factors include shareholdings, voting rights, rights to appoint or remove directors, and any agreements or arrangements that may give an individual or entity significant influence over the company. By evaluating these criteria, companies can identify and disclose their PSCs as required by UK law.
Types of PSCs
PSCs can be categorised into two main types: individual PSCs and corporate PSCs.
Individual PSCs and their disclosure
An individual PSC is a person who meets the criteria for significant control over a company. This can include majority shareholders, founders, or key decision-makers within the organisation who shoulder essential directors' duties in the UK. The law mandates that individual PSCs must be disclosed by the company, and their information is made publicly available through the Companies House register.
Corporate PSCs and ultimate beneficial owners
Corporate PSCs are entities that have significant control over a company. This can include other businesses, trusts, or partnerships. If a corporate entity is listed as a PSC, it must identify its ultimate beneficial owners, which are the individuals who ultimately have control over the corporate entity. These ultimate beneficial owners must also be disclosed to maintain transparency.
PSC Statements and Filings
Once PSCs are identified, companies are required to prepare and submit PSC statements to the Companies House. These statements provide details of the PSCs and their respective levels of control or influence. It is crucial for companies to understand the process of preparing these statements accurately to ensure compliance with the law and maintain transparency.
Preparing and submitting PSC statements
When preparing a PSC statement, companies must gather the necessary information about their PSCs, such as their names, addresses, and nature of control. This information should be regularly updated to reflect any changes in PSC status. Once the statement is complete, it should be submitted to the Companies House within the specified timeframe to avoid penalties or non-compliance issues.
Filing requirements with Companies House
Companies House, the UK government's official register of companies, plays a crucial role in maintaining transparency in corporate ownership. Fulfilling these requirements is a key part of any business checklist. Along with the submission of PSC statements, companies are also required to file other documentation regarding their structure, directors, and shareholders. These filings help track changes within companies and ensure that the register is up to date and reflects the accurate ownership structure of businesses operating in the UK.
Beneficial Ownership and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Compliance
The identification and disclosure of PSCs are closely linked to anti-money laundering efforts. Knowing who owns and controls companies helps prevent the misuse of corporate structures for money laundering, fraud, or other illicit activities. By maintaining transparency and ensuring compliance with AML regulations, the UK aims to create a safer business environment while also discouraging illegal practices within the corporate sector.
Enforcement and Penalties
The UK government takes the transparency of corporate ownership seriously and has implemented strict enforcement measures to ensure compliance. Failure to identify and disclose the PSCs or providing false information can lead to severe penalties or criminal charges. It is, therefore, imperative for companies to familiarise themselves with the requirements and fulfill their obligations to avoid legal consequences.
Transparency in UK corporate ownership is a crucial step towards preventing financial crimes and maintaining trust in the business world. By identifying and disclosing People with Significant Control, the UK government aims to create an environment where responsible and ethical business practices are the norm. Through proper compliance and understanding of the regulations, companies can contribute to a more transparent and secure corporate landscape in the UK.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the PSC regime, integral to the transparency in corporate ownership, remains a key part of the UK's strategy to promote good corporate behaviour, prevent illegal activities and ensure a fair, transparent, and secure business landscape. By complying with these regulations, companies can play a pivotal role in making the business world a more trustworthy and safer place for all.