- Osome Blog SG
- Best Countries to Incorporate for Australian Founders
Best Countries to Incorporate for Australian Founders in 2026
- Published: 26 August 2026
- 6 min read
- Company Registration, Foreigner's Guide
Ruth Dsouza
Author
Ruth Dsouza Prabhu is a content developer with a passion for turning ideas into clear, engaging narratives. With a strong background in marketing communications and lifestyle writing, she simplifies complex business topics for entrepreneurs. Her work spans strategy, storytelling, and thought leadership, always focused on clarity, credibility, and impact.
Australia's capital gains tax (CGT) reform has sparked a genuine rethink among founders about where to build. Singapore, Hong Kong, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are all getting a fresh look. But incorporating offshore doesn't automatically solve the tax problem, and the right jurisdiction depends entirely on the kind of business being built. Here's what's driving the interest, and how to think about the decision.
Key Takeaways
- Australia's 2026 CGT reform, replacing the 50% discount with cost base indexation and a 30% minimum tax from 1 July 2027, is renewing interest in offshore structuring.
- Incorporating offshore doesn't automatically make a founder an Australian tax non-resident. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) still looks at where real decisions are made.
- Singapore, Hong Kong, the UK, and the UAE each suit a different kind of founder, so the right fit depends on the business, not just the headline tax rate.
Why Are Australian Founders Considering Singapore, Hong Kong, the UK, and the UAE Right Now?
The trigger is Australia's CGT reform, confirmed in the 2026-27 Federal Budget:
- From 1 July 2027, the 50% CGT discount is replaced with cost base indexation and a 30% minimum tax on net capital gains
- Founder equity is hit particularly hard, since shares are often issued at a nominal cost base, leaving little for indexation to reduce
- Public reaction has been swift. Gilmour Space co-founder Adam Gilmour has said the changes could push investor interest away from Australian stocks, and the company is now weighing a Nasdaq listing over the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)
Founders considering these markets are largely building with an international structure from the outset, or restructuring an existing business to operate across borders, rather than abandoning Australia altogether.
Does Offshore Incorporation Change Your Tax Residency?
Incorporating in Singapore, Hong Kong, the UK, or the UAE doesn't, by itself, change an Australian founder's tax position:
- The ATO uses a test called central management and control (CM&C) to decide whether a foreign company is genuinely managed from outside Australia
- If the founder is still the one making the real decisions from Australia, the company can be treated as an Australian tax resident regardless of where it's registered
- Genuine substance, such as relocating personally or building an active offshore board, is what actually shifts the tax position
Does the new start-up carve-out change anything?
Not for everyone, and not yet:
- The government has proposed an Innovative Business CGT Concession that could give eligible founders a choice between the 50% discount and the new indexation model
- It comes with real limits: a $ 50 million turnover cap, a company age limit, a five-year holding requirement, and a $ 10 million lifetime cap on the gain it applies to
- It's still awaiting legislation, so it isn't something to plan around yet
For founders who don't fit the criteria or don't want to wait on it, offshore structuring remains a live option.
Understand Singapore taxes at a glance
Our free guide breaks down Singapore’s tax rates, employee-related taxes, and the exemptions and reliefs your business may qualify for — clearly and simply
Singapore, Hong Kong, the UK, or the UAE: Which Fits Your Business?
Tax rate is rarely the right starting point. What matters more is what the business actually needs: institutional investor credibility, a China-facing supply chain, a fast and cheap solo structure, or a genuine personal relocation.
Market | Best for | Speed to incorporate | Headline tax | Best-case effective rate | Flagship visa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singapore | Venture-backed founders raising institutional capital | 1 to 3 working days | 17% | 4% to 7% for qualifying start-ups | EntrePass |
| Hong Kong | Founders with a China-facing supply chain | 1 to 3 working days | 8.25% on the first HK$ 2 million, 16.5% after | 0% on properly documented offshore-sourced profits | Top Talent Pass |
| The UK | Solo consultants and lean, early-stage founders | Within 24 hours | 19% up to £ 50,000 profit, 25% above £ 250,000 | 19%, no territorial relief | Innovator Founder Visa |
| The UAE | Founders relocating personally, or founders with Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and westward-facing trade | 2 to 10 days, depending on the Free Zone | 9% above AED 375,000 | 0% for Qualifying Free Zone Persons, subject to genuine substance | Golden Visa |
AUD figures are indicative conversions based on exchange rates as of August 2026.
A few patterns can help if two markets are still in the running:
- Singapore or the UAE: the deciding factor is usually whether the founder is relocating personally. A permanent move tips it towards the UAE. Staying in Australia while raising institutional capital keeps Singapore's credibility ahead
- Hong Kong or the UAE: this one tends to follow the supply chain. A China-facing business fits Hong Kong more naturally, while GCC or westward-facing trade fits the UAE
- The UK or Singapore: this comes down to stage. An early, lean operation suits the UK's low overhead, while a business ready to scale regionally and raise funds fits Singapore better
Osome's company incorporation plans bundle registration, compliance, and ongoing support into one transparent fee for Singapore, Hong Kong, and the UK, so there's nothing to add up separately.
What Does Each Market Actually Cost an Early-Stage Founder?
Each market has one dominant recurring cost that shapes the real year-one number, not just the headline fee:
Market | Dominant recurring cost | Osome package, year one |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | Resident nominee director, S$ 2,000 to S$ 4,000 a year, since every foreign founder needs one | From approximately S$ 3,772 (roughly AU$ 4,150) |
| Hong Kong | Mandatory annual audit for every active company, with no small-company exemption | From approximately HK$ 17,450 (roughly AU$ 3,190) |
| The UK | No resident director and no mandatory audit for small companies, the cheapest entry point of the four | From £ 299 + Value Added Tax (VAT) for incorporation (roughly AU$ 570), accounting from £ 850 a year + VAT (roughly AU$ 1,620) |
| The UAE | No nominee director, but the trade licence and audit (where required) are renewed annually, and the visa and Emirates ID are a one-time cost on top | Roughly AED 16,800 to 27,975, depending on Free Zone (roughly AU$ 6,550 to AU$ 10,910) |
None of these numbers make the decision for a founder on their own. They're the detail that turns "which market is right" into "what will this actually cost to run," which is the question that matters once the initial excitement of relocating settles into a real operating decision.
Getting this right from the outset avoids the more expensive alternative: discovering the real running cost, or the real substance requirement, after the structure is already in place. Osome supports founders incorporating in Singapore, Hong Kong, and the UK directly, and in the UAE, handles the accounting, compliance, and tax side while a Free Zone partner manages the licence and visa setup.
Ruth Dsouza Prabhu is a content developer with a passion for turning ideas into clear, engaging narratives. With a strong background in marketing communications and lifestyle writing, she simplifies complex business topics for entrepreneurs. Her work spans strategy, storytelling, and thought leadership, always focused on clarity, credibility, and impact.
